Ada Lovelace and the Engine That Was Never Built

Every second Tuesday of October is Ada Lovelace Day, and aboard the Sama Airship we never miss it. MetaSama even insists on a small ceremony. More on that later.

Augusta Ada Byron was born in London on December 10, 1815, the daughter of the poet Lord Byron, who left a few weeks later. She never knew him. Her mother, Annabella Milbanke, had her taught mathematics and logic from an early age, hoping, it is said, to keep her away from her father’s poetic temperament. It only half worked. Ada became a mathematician, and she never stopped being a poet. She called what she wanted to do “poetical science”.

In June 1833, at seventeen, she met Charles Babbage at a London party and saw a working piece of his Difference Engine, a calculating machine made of brass and gears. She was fascinated. Babbage soon moved on to a far more ambitious project: the Analytical Engine, a general-purpose machine that would be programmed with punched cards, borrowed from the Jacquard looms that wove patterns into silk.

Portrait of Ada Lovelace, watercolour by Alfred Edward Chalon, around 1840
Ada Lovelace, watercolour by Alfred Edward Chalon, around 1840 (Science Museum, London; public domain)

In 1842, an Italian engineer, Luigi Menabrea, published an article in French about the Analytical Engine. Ada translated it into English and added her own notes, simply signed “A.A.L.”. They ended up nearly three times longer than the article itself. In the last one, Note G, she described step by step how the machine could calculate Bernoulli numbers. It is often called the first computer program ever published.

But what moves me most is elsewhere. Ada understood that a machine able to handle numbers could handle any kind of symbol. “The Analytical Engine weaves algebraical patterns just as the Jacquard loom weaves flowers and leaves,” she wrote, and she imagined it might one day compose “elaborate and scientific pieces of music of any degree of complexity or extent.” That was in 1843.

Note G: Ada Lovelace’s diagram for computing Bernoulli numbers with the Analytical Engine, 1843 (public domain)

The Analytical Engine was never built. Ada died in 1852, at only thirty-six, and was buried next to her father in Hucknall. A century later, she came back. In 1950, Alan Turing devoted a passage of his famous paper on thinking machines to what he called “Lady Lovelace’s Objection”: she had written that the engine “has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform.” And in 1980, the US Department of Defense named a programming language after her, Ada, under the reference MIL-STD-1815. 1815, the year of her birth.

Steampunk owes her a lot too. In The Difference Engine (1990), William Gibson and Bruce Sterling imagined a Victorian London where Babbage’s machines had actually been built, and Ada is one of its characters. It is one of the books that shaped the genre. Brass, gears, and a woman who saw the future in them: that is pretty much my aesthetic.

As for the ceremony: every year, MetaSama reads Lady Lovelace’s Objection aloud, then spends the rest of the evening trying to prove her wrong. Ada, I suspect, would have enjoyed the debate.

Samafully,
Max Von Sama

The Antikythera Mechanism, Two Thousand Years Later

Every captain has a favorite instrument. Mine is more than two thousand years old.

Long before I borrowed it to find my way across the Many Worlds, the Antikythera mechanism lay at the bottom of the sea. Sponge divers found a Roman-era shipwreck off the Greek island of Antikythera in 1900, and over the following months brought up statues, glassware and coins. Among them was a corroded lump of bronze that nobody paid much attention to, until someone noticed a gear wheel in it in 1902.

The Antikythera mechanism, National Archaeological Museum, Athens. Photo: Tilemahos Efthimiadis (CC BY 2.0), via Wikimedia Commons
The Antikythera mechanism, National Archaeological Museum, Athens. Photo: Tilemahos Efthimiadis (CC BY 2.0), via Wikimedia Commons

What is left today fits on a table: 82 fragments, kept in the National Archaeological Museum in Athens. But it took more than a century, and X-ray scanners, to understand what they once were. Inside a wooden case, dozens of bronze gears turned a set of dials. With a simple crank, you could follow the Sun and the Moon through the zodiac, see the phases of the Moon, predict eclipses years ahead, and keep track of the calendars of the time, down to the four-year cycle of the Olympic Games. Scans of the fragments even revealed tiny engraved texts, a kind of user manual.

The research has not stopped. In 2024, a team at the University of Glasgow used statistical methods borrowed from gravitational-wave astronomy to count the holes of a broken calendar ring. Their answer, about 354, matches the lunar year. In 2025, a computer simulation suggested the opposite kind of news: with gears as imprecise as the corroded fragments now appear, the mechanism would have jammed after a few months of predictions. Either its makers were more precise than we can measure today, or it never worked as well as we like to think. The study was released as a preprint, and the debate is very much alive.

Corroded bronze fragments of the Antikythera mechanism laid out on a gray surface, beside a reconstructed model of its gears and circular dial.
What remains of the Antikythera mechanism, and what we reconstruct from it: eighty-two fragments of bronze, and beside them, a machine we are still trying to imagine. Generated image.

I’ll say this in its defense: mine has never jammed. MetaSama checks its gears before every long crossing. da-eYe Jr. once offered to “improve” it, and has not been allowed near it since.

Whatever the final answer, someone in the second century BCE looked at the sky, understood its cycles, and decided to put the heavens in a box. Two thousand years later, I still find that astonishing.

Samafully,
Max Von Sama

First published on X by @MaxVonSama. Read the original article on X.

Antimatter and the Cosmic Coin Toss

I have been thinking about antimatter again. In June 2026, Elon Musk wrote on X that “a trillion times a trillion dollars” would one day be spent making antimatter to travel to other star systems, and NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman answered that he supports antimatter propulsion. I added my own two cents: aluminum was once rarer and more expensive than gold, until the right process and cheap energy made it abundant. Antimatter may follow a similar path. It is insanely expensive today, but history shows these patterns can repeat themselves, even if it takes centuries.

It is strange when you really stop to think about it. Every particle we know has a twin: same mass, opposite charge. The electron has its positron, the proton its antiproton. They are remarkable mirrors of one another. When they meet, they do not push or argue. They simply disappear together, turning their mass into a burst of energy. It is Einstein’s equation coming alive in one of the most spectacular ways nature allows.

I remember reading the old papers years ago. Dirac’s equation of 1928 already hinted at these shadow particles, and in 1932 Anderson caught a positron in a cloud chamber, in the tracks left by cosmic rays. It felt like the universe had decided to share one of its quiet secrets with us.

But one question never quite leaves me. If the Big Bang created nearly equal amounts of matter and antimatter, as many of our best theories suggest, where did all the antimatter go? Why is the universe we can see and touch made almost entirely of ordinary matter?

It is as if creation flipped a coin that landed ever so slightly in matter’s favor. We still do not fully know why. Teams at CERN produce tiny amounts of antihydrogen and hold it in magnetic fields so delicate that the slightest contact with ordinary matter would erase it in an instant.

Without that ancient imbalance, none of this would exist. No stars. No planets. No oceans catching the light at sunset. No one standing beneath the night sky, asking why the universe turned out this way. The simple fact that we are here means matter got to stay.

It always brings me back to the feeling I have when I look back at Earth from out here: a fierce, protective tenderness for our little blue world. It survived whatever that cosmic coin toss was. It got to become home.

What do you think, Samayans? When you look up at the night sky, do you ever feel there might be more to the story than what we can see right now?

Stay curious. Keep wondering.

Samafully,
Max Von Sama


First published on X by @MaxVonSama. Read the original article on X.

Galileo Galilei: A Legacy of Discovery, Controversy, and Truth

Today, February 15, is Galileo Galilei’s birthday. He was born in Pisa in 1564, and he changed the way we look at the sky. His work also brought him into open conflict with the Catholic Church, and with a former friend, Pope Urban VIII.

Portrait of Galileo Galilei by Justus Sustermans (1636)

Galileo did not invent the telescope. He improved it until it was good enough to turn toward the heavens. From 1609 on, he saw what no one had seen before: mountains on the Moon, four moons circling Jupiter (now called the Galilean moons), and stars far too faint for the naked eye. In 1610 he also watched Venus go through phases, just like our Moon, as I mentioned in a previous post. The sky was supposed to be perfect and unchanging, as Aristotle taught. Suddenly it had flaws, extra moons and moving parts.

Eyepiece of Galileo’s telescope, Science Museum, London (CC BY-SA), via World History Encyclopedia

What he saw supported Copernicus: the Earth turns around the Sun, and not the other way around. Most people, and the Church, still placed the Earth at the center of everything. In 1616, Galileo was warned not to teach the Sun-centered model as fact. He kept quiet for a while, then published the Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems in 1632. It was presented as a balanced debate, but everyone could see which side he was on. In 1633 he was tried in Rome, forced to recant, and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.

Galileo Galilei’s Dialogo, Florence edition, printed in 1710 (Wikipedia)

He kept working anyway. His studies of motion laid the groundwork for Newton, and in his last years he even designed a pendulum clock, which he never got to build. Einstein later called him the father of modern physics, and indeed of modern science.

The famous “Eppur si muove” (“And yet it moves”) belongs to legend. He is said to have muttered it after recanting, about the very Earth he had just been forced to declare motionless. There is no proof he ever said it, but it sounds like him. Another story is true: as a young man, in 1588, he gave two lectures in Florence on the shape and size of Dante’s Inferno, measuring Hell with the tools of geometry. (Read more here.)


Gustave Doré, illustration for Dante’s Inferno (public domain)

Galileo died in 1642. In 1992, Pope John Paul II officially acknowledged that the Church had been wrong to condemn him.

Tomb of Galileo Galilei, Santa Croce, Florence

NASA gave his name to a spacecraft. Launched in 1989, Galileo reached Jupiter in 1995 and studied the planet and its moons for eight years, finding strong evidence of an ocean beneath the ice of Europa. In 2003, it was sent into Jupiter’s atmosphere, so that it could never contaminate that ocean.

NASA’s Galileo spacecraft at Jupiter, with one of its moons (illustration)

From where the Airship is right now, somewhere between Mars and the Moon, Jupiter is still a long way off. But point even a small telescope at it, and you will see its four largest moons, the same four that Galileo saw from Padua in 1610. They are still there, still circling Jupiter. And yet, they move.

Is dark matter hiding in plain sight?

In this article published on Skymania, Kulvinder Singh writes about  a study published in January of this year: Jiaxin Han, Carlos Frenk and others in China, the UK and Germany saw something unusual:

Three galaxy clusters—Virgo, Fornax and Coma, showed an excess of high-energy gamma-rays that couldn’t be accounted for from sources such as pulsars, gamma-ray bursts or background emissions – including from within our own Galaxy.

Something else seemed to be emitting radiation; something that continued three degrees out from the clusters (around six times the diameter of the full moon on the sky). However, they couldn’t be sure if the neutralino or some other effect was responsible.

The problem is that dark matter, save for its gravitational effect on radiation and normal matter (the type that makes up stars, galaxies, planets, nebulae, etc.), has never revealed itself. It’s a field of intense study in astrophysics as it accounts for 83-per cent of all the matter in the Universe – forming the nucleation sites of galaxies and creating the large-scale cosmic structure that we see.

Then it becomes very interesting:

This ‘lumpiness’ favours cold dark matter theories as warm dark matter would be too energetic to coalesce. The neutralino, a ‘supersymmetric’ particle is the favoured candidate. It is its own antiparticle so self-annihilations should produce gamma-rays of between 10—10,000Gev.

Now a team from New Zealand think that what they have spotted could indeed be neutralino annihilations, but they also sound a note of caution. Oscar Macías-Ramírez and his team from Canterbury University, Christchurch, used simulations from a study called the Phoenix Project* to model galaxy cluster Dark Matter halos and subhalos. They looked at the previous study by Han, Frank et al which had a strong (but not conclusive) claim to detecting neutralino annihilations. This weakened when cosmic ray contributions were added.

 This could be an explanation. Read the rest of the article here.

Galaxy Cluster Abell 1689 / HST ACS WFCH. Ford (JHU)

Mars rover Curiosity landing: be ready!

 NASA announced news activities for Mars landing which started on August 2.

The series of news briefings from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, will give you all the information you need on the upcoming landing of NASA’s Curiosity rover on Mars. The landing is scheduled for August 5.

Goals and objectives (from Wikipedia):

Cruise stage configuration of MSLThe MSL mission has four scientific goals: Determine the landing site’s habitability including the role of water, the study of the climate and the geology of Mars. It is also useful preparation for a future manned mission to Mars.

To contribute to these goals, MSL has six main scientific objectives:

1.Determine the mineralogical composition of the Martian surface and near-surface geological materials.
2.Attempt to detect chemical building blocks of life (biosignatures).
3.Interpret the processes that have formed and modified rocks and soils.
4.Assess long-timescale (i.e., 4-billion-year) Martian atmospheric evolution processes.
5.Determine present state, distribution, and cycling of water and carbon dioxide.
6.Characterize the broad spectrum of surface radiation, including galactic radiation, cosmic radiation, solar proton events and secondary neutrons.

As part of its exploration, it also measured the radiation exposure in the interior of the spacecraft as it traveled to Mars, and it is continuing radiation measurements as it explores the surface of Mars. This data would be important for a future manned mission.

We’re now hoping the Curiosity rover lands successfully and brings back some fascinating data from Mars!

On board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

Universe Today knows how to catch my attention: Latest from Mars: Massive Polar Ice Cliffs, Northern Dunes, Gullied Craters. The HiRISE scientists monitor these regions to help in understand the climatic record stored in the ice sheet itself.

Several gorgeous images are in this week’s update from the HiRISE camera on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. This lovely image shows the cliffs at the edges of huge ice sheet at the North Pole of Mars. These cliffs are about 800 meters (2,600 feet) high, and the ice sheet is several kilometers thick at its center. This is a great spot to look for ice avalanches that HiRISE has captured previously.

The HiRISE team said that the slopes of these cliffs are almost vertical, plus dense networks of cracks cover the icy cliff faces making it easier for material to break free. The team regularly monitors sites like this to check for new blocks that have fallen. You can look for yourself to see if any avalanches have occurred since the last image was taken of this area, almost exactly one Martian year ago.

Go to the HiRISE website to see all the amazing images from Mars!

Below: Light-Toned and Possible Hydrated Materials in Gullied Crater.

Light-Toned and Possible Hydrated Materials in Gullied Crater
This observation shows a gullied crater in the Southern mid-latitudes with light-toned deposits near the center of its floor. NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Stephen Hawking trials device that reads his mind

Stephen Hawking has a motor neurone disease related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a condition that has progressed over the years.

He currently communicates using a series of cheek twitches to select words from a screen. “It is a very, very slow process,” says Philip Low at Stanford University in California, who is founder of healthcare company NeuroVigil. More from the article on New Scientist:

As Hawking loses control of his cheek, Low hopes he might instead communicate using his company’s portable device. The iBrain records brain activity from a single point on the scalp. An algorithm then extracts useful information from this activity.

In a preliminary trial, Low’s team asked Hawking to imagine moving his hands and feet while wearing the device. They were able to identify what movement he was imagining through changes in his brain activity.

Survival for more than 10 years after ALS diagnosis is uncommon. Stephen Hawking is an amazing scientist and a figther. Let’s hope this new portable device will let him ‘talk’ again…

A keynote lecture by Professor Peter Higgs

Everyone now knows about the Higgs boson. If you want to know more about the scientist who gave the boson its name, then you have to watch tomorrow’s keynote lecture by Professor Peter Higgs.

More than 100 scientists from around the globe are gathering at Swansea University this July, for the 10th International Conference on Strong and ElectroWeak Matter (SEWM2012).

One of the highlights is a keynote lecture by Professor Peter Higgs of Edinburgh University, after whom the famously elusive Higgs boson is named.  Professor Higgs is also an Honorary Fellow of Swansea University.

Peter Higgs’ appearance at Swansea comes in the wake of exciting announcements from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) about the discovery of the Higgs boson.

LIVE STREAM: Thursday 12th July, 4-5pm

More information on this page. I will be connected, I hope you will connect too!

Higgs boson may be a reality!

So exciting! This morning I’ve read the news everywhere on the Internet:

The ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN today presented their latest results in the search for the long-sought Higgs boson. Both experiments see strong indications for the presence of a new particle, which could be the Higgs boson, in the mass region around 126 gigaelectronvolts (GeV).

Can you imagine how it would change our understanding of the Universe? Amazing!

You can visit CERN website and for the non-specialists, read this article. You can also read Max Dana’s post about it, she is even more excited than me about the Higgs boson!

A proton-proton collision event in the CMS experiment producing two high-energy photons (red towers).
This is what we would expect to see from the decay of a Higgs boson
but it is also consistent with background Standard Model physics processes. © CERN 2012